Is it the End of the Nature Versus Nurture Debate Essay

Is it the End of the Nature Versus Nurture Debate - Essay ExampleAs observed by France De Waal (1999), the contribution of disposition has been enormous and may be justified by advancements in neural sciences. He concludes that the nature V nurture debate essential be given new direction. Similarly, Eric Parens (1996) supported the view of remarkable role of behavioral genetics in human behavior and hence he favors the nature system and seeks to continue the nature V nurture debate. However, Steven Pinker (2004) was of opinion that nature and nurture wont go away and he feels that there will be interaction among several factors of both environment and nature. In this context, all researchers rent however agreed that the nature V nurture debate will have political and ideological implications and hence the discussion should be properly regulated.Though it is not proper to state that the nature V nurture debate should be completely abandoned, reorientation of the subject mater is passing needed. Initially support has come to Social Darwinism that is a doctrine based on genetic determinism and inherent selection, advocating a laissez-faire capitalist economy and promoting eugenics, racism and the inherent inequality of such a society. Mendels laws of genetics and inheritance also supported the theory of nature for human behavior. After 1945, the debate swung in favor of nurture, with American psychologists taking up a rhetoric of environmental influences on behavior, stress the learning process. In turn, the European school of ethology arose in opposition to the environmentalists, focusing on innate behavior which is of genetic origin. In 1960s in the USA, views were highly favoring nurture theory as all people are capable of producing better performance if given conducive environmental conditions in which to reach their potential.Since beginning, psychological science was focused as major subject for explaining the nurture theory for human